The .gov means its official. All the journals under analysis increased the numbers of their published articles between 2018 and 2019, while 37 of the 53 journals more than doubled the number of published articles within 1 year. 2020b). However, the reality is that this process is by no means simple, as Aromataris and Stern (2020) accurately indicated, particularly because predatory publishers have continued to evolve their undesirable art form into sophisticated operations that appear to be, at face value, legitimate to the point where certain journals and publishers may blatantly exploit gray strategies given that downmarket niches can be lucrative (Siler 2020). being able to get an erection, but not having it last long enough for sex. 2019) and therefore jeopardize integrity in science. Finally, the intense proliferation of predatory journals has given rise to predatory/fake conferences, equally pernicious for academia, and the subject of warnings from COPE (2019), as predatory journals and conferences are two sides of the same coin (Cortegiani et al. Where an MDPI-journal was ranked in more than one category, the leading journal with a higher impact factor in those categories in 2018 was selected for comparison (Table 2). The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) released the Principles of Transparency and Best Practices in Scholarly Publishing (last version published 15 January 2018) together with the Directory of Open-Access Journals (DOAJ), the Open-Access Scholarly Publishers Association (OASPA), and the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME). GR and ASB drafted the manuscript that was approved by all authors. Most patients are diagnosed at advanced stages due to the subtle symptoms of earlier disease and the low rate of regular screening. Journals. Received 2019 Aug 26; Revised 2019 Sep 30; Accepted 2019 Oct 1. Moreover, indexing in PubMed was a major criterion in the present survey for scientists to choose a journal for publication of their scientific work. The high rate of self-citations of the journal Sustainability is coherent with data that the journal itself provided in its bibliometric review over the period 200918 (https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/5/1655), showing that Sustainability ranks first in citing journals (2,496 cites) very much over the Journal of Cleaner Production that occupies second position (658 cites) in this bibliographic review. cancer treatment The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of PG2 as a complementary treatment among stage Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Curative, neoadjuvant, and adjuvant Universities, professional associations, ). As such a single proxy was used in the form of the non-MDPI leading journal. For WebOnly Open Access Journals Only SciELO Journals Only WoS Journals and transmitted securely. Diagnosing cancer at its earliest stages often provides the best chance for a cure. The extent to which predatory journals can harm scientific practice increases as the numbers of such journals expand, in so far as they undermine scientific integrity, quality, and credibility, especially if those journals leak into prestigious databases. In this survey, we could demonstrate that over one-third of the participating scientist in Austria and Germany are not aware of the predatory journal problem, although almost all participants indicated that they are actively read scientific articles. 2019). The influx of predatory publishing along with the substantial increase in the number of predatory journals pose a risk to scholarly communication [ 1, 2 ]. Predatory journals often lack an appropriate peer-review process and frequently are not indexed [ 3 ], yet authors are required to pay an article processing charge. Cancer screening. Published by Oxford University Press. Hence, specific recommendations are given to researchers, educational institutions and prestigious databases advising them to review their working relations with those sorts of journals. Obesity Is Associated with Immunometabolic Changes in Adipose Tissue That May Drive Treatment Resistance in Breast Cancer: Immune-Metabolic Reprogramming and Novel Therapeutic Strategies. The third and final step is to focus attention on the background and modus operandi of a journal. Therefore, these Principles, supported by different institutions, are useful for detecting deviation from best practices in publishing. Once again, days from submission to first decision varied greatly, even within the same research field in Elsevier journals, while the MDPI-journals under analysis presented much greater homogeneity and, even, less difference between the maximum and the minimum times, which is to say the lowest intervals. Data sources Published studies in Medline from 1 January 2000 to 10 April 2020. Once accepted, time to posting the final word document online on a reputable journals Web site i.e. ED is often a symptom of another health problem or health-related factor. no experience (1), nothing (3),~1000 (1), dont care (1). Indeed, the majority of participants in the present study indicated no or insufficient peer review as a major hallmark of predatory journals. Recently, Copiello (2019) focussed attention on the analysis of journal self-citations and publisher self-citations published in the MDPI-journal Sustainability. METHODS We disaggregated men with prostate adenocarcinoma from the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2017 by In consequence, the scientific community recently initiated a discussion to increase the required prerequisites for a journal to be listed in PubMed.14 The results of the present survey highlight, that a broader education on how to identify predatory journals and proper resources and tools to facilitate this are urgently needed in the oncology scientific community, as there was no difference between the knowledge groups with regard to confrontation with scientific studies by patients. Journal of Cancer Prevention is a multi-disciplinary journal that aims to promote an increased awareness of all aspects of cancer research that ultimately leads to cancer prevention. Advancing Cancer Therapy The journal Nature recently published a definition of the predatory journal (Grudniewicz et al. 2020). *, n (%) (n=169), How many publications did you co-author? There were 53 MDPI-indexed journals in the JCR (2018), 20 of which were ranked Q1, 25 were ranked Q2, and only 8 were ranked Q3 (see Table 1). 2020). The Swedish Childhood Tumor Biobank (BTB) is a nonprofit national infrastructure for collecting tissue samples and genomic data from pediatric patients diagnosed with central nervous system (CNS) and other solid tumors. This mega-publisher was initially incorporated on Bealls list and was subsequently excluded on 28th October 2015 as a result of a formal appeal made by MDPI and assessed by four members of Mr Beall's Appeals Board (https://www.mdpi.com/about/announcements/534). The BTB is built on a multidisciplinary network established to provide the scientific community with standardized (3) Advertising: Is a rapid peer-review process advertised or guaranteed? Introduction: Predatory journals harm the integrity of science as principles of 'good scientific practice' are bypassed by omitting a proper peer-review process. n, (%), If yes, which type of media do you use? These journals are analysed, not only to contrast the formal criteria for the identification of predatory journals, but taking a step further, their background is also analysed with regard to self-citations and the source of those self-citations in 2018 and 2019. Divison of Oncology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria, 3 All missing responses were excluded from subsequent statistical analyses. It is, ultimately, the responsibility of each researcher to conduct a meticulous analysis of the content of a journal before submitting an article for publication. Open Access free for readers, with article processing charges (APC) paid by authors or their institutions. Systemic therapies for GC, including chemotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy, have evolved significantly in the past few years. In patients with hormone receptorpositive early-stage breast cancer, adjuvant endocrine treatment administered for up to 5-10 years after diagnosis significantly reduces the risk of recurrence and death. In conclusion, in the present survey among scientists in the field of medical oncology and haematology, the majority of participants was aware of the concept and potential negative impact of predatory journals on scientific publishing quality and integrity. In 2019, almost all 53 MDPI-journals under analysis had intra-MDPI citation rates well above 20% (all except Universe11.87% and Catalysts18.73%), reaching values as high as 56.94% in Electronics, 51.07% in the IJGI, 47.56% in Remote Sensing, and 46.55% in Sustainability (Table 3). However, this solution could only work in the medium to long term. How many publications did you author as first or last author? Here, we tried to survey its potential impact on the field of oncology. A review of content output in the leading journals was not conducted. As a control group for comparison with JCR-indexed MDPI-journals, the top ranked journal by Impact Factor in each relevant subject category were selected (all under the joint name of non-MDPI-journals in this study) (Table 1). Symptoms (https://dbh.nsd.uib.no/publiseringskanaler/KanalForlagInfo.action?id=26778andbibsys=false). Review Article. Patient consent for publication: Not required. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Answers of all participants on the topic of predatory publishing. On the Cost of Journal Use in the Digital Era, Demarcating Spectrums of Predatory Publishing: Economic and Institutional Sources of Academic Legitimacy, Journal of Association for Information Science and Technology, A Study of Open Access Journals Using Article Processing Charges, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Understanding Quality in Research: Avoiding Predatory Journals, Excessively Long Editorial Decisions and Excessiveley Long Publication Times by Journals: Causes, Risks, Consequences, and Proposed Solutions, Predatory Journals Authors and Readers Beware, Researchers May Be Part of the Problem in Predatory Publishing, The Influence of Editorial Decisions and the Academic Network on Self-Citations and Journal Impact Factors, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Thechnology. being able to get an erection, but not having it last long enough for sex. Focussing our attention on the 53 MDPI-journals under analysis, 84.9% of their websites reported that they provided a first decision within <19days. One hundred and eighty-eight participants (55 women (29.2%), 128 men (68.1%)) completed the questionnaire. Elsevier provided a framework to assess time from submission to first decision in relative terms (Table 5). Normal distribution of participants, agethe only continuous parameterwas analysed by Q-Q plots and Shapiro-Wilk Test and therefore reported as median and IQR; all other parameters were summarised as absolute and relative frequencies. Disclaimer: Any views, opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those solely of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of ESMO or Roche. WebJournals. More specifically, in general terms, the average time from submission to first decision from MDPI-journals was 19days, both in 2019 and 2018 (MDPI 2020), despite the increase in the number of both journals (15 new journals from 2018) and articles which were published (a 64.1% increase compared to 2018). A platinum/diamond open-access model might be close to an ideal academic publishing modelaccording to the terminology of Siler (2020)since it prioritizes professional rather than market logics and then eliminates the drive to publish as many articles as possible to maximize revenue. PURPOSE Reporting racial/ethnic disparities in aggregate obscures within-group heterogeneity. (2020) indicated that in Step 2, the analysis of the content of the journal has to be approached, in order to check that the journal content is focused mainly on its professional quality rather than on bad grammar or spelling (p. 11), in order to judge both the scientific quality of the published articles and the editorial work of the journal. Richtig G, Berger M, Lange-Asschenfeldt B, et al.. (2020)and in Scopus (Hedding 2019; Cortegiani et al. being able to get an erection sometimes, but not every time you want to have sex. The Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, School of Medical Sciences, Manchester, UK, 7 2020). In 2019, 24 journals out of 53 had self-citation rates as high as 15%, which is the upper end of the normal range set by Clarivate (Table 2). As shown in Figure 1, the number of articles published in 2019 in each journal varied highly, ranging from 226 in Vaccines to 7,414 in Sustainability. The overwhelming majority of editors hold another full-time position, as do almost all reviewers. (PubMed, MEDLINE, web of science, DOAJ, ) (6) Published work: Is the published workincluding layout and figuresof scientific quality/good copy-editing and free of spelling errors?7 However, all these aspects should be respected together to get a bigger picture of a new journal when considering a specific journal. The following analysis addressed the peer-review process. Globally, the total number of articles published in 2019 by the 53 MDPI-journals under analysis was 93,240, representing a global increase of 74.95% in 2018. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide, This PDF is available to Subscribers Only. The Author(s) 2021. Intra-MDPI citation rate 2018 and 2019 (top 10 citing journals). It is therefore essential to define the concept not to solely rely on specific criteria.

Versace Pour Femme 50ml, How Much Does A Beach Launcher Cost, Gmundner Keramik Outlet, Royal Caribbean Covid Update, Articles J